NASA hide discovery of buildings on the Moon, former employees claim

Former NASA employees claim to have seen and possessed evidence that the Apollo missions had the specific purpose of studying buildings photographed by unmanned probes.

“Buildings in ruins; buildings on the surface of the Moon; buildings that seemed very old. But who built them? We, humans? Obviously not. There was only one conclusion: This was the work of a non-human civilization.”

Shortly after the Eagle module landed on the surface of the Moon in July 1969, Neil Armstrong's heart rate accelerated to 160 beats per minute. According to NASA, the astronaut's heart was racing due to collecting rocks for the lunar module. However, four decades after the first landing on the Moon, another version questions the true origin of the excitement that the astronauts experienced during the Apollo mission.

A much more obscure version is assured by JJ Benitez:

“It was not the insignificant weight of the rocks that excited Armstrong's heart, but the sight of that building.”

According to Benitez, the real reason for the “Apollo” missions was to document, in the best possible way, certain buildings that had been photographed by unmanned American satellites.

The investigator reported:

“Everything was meticulously planned.”

Since Apollo 11 returned from its mission, many high-ranking officials responsible for lunar missions have hinted at the existence of a discovery of spectacular magnitude, which was omitted by the US space agency to the international press.

Former Apollo 11 science advisor Richard Hoagland said:

“Our astronauts observed ruins of lunar cities, transparent pyramids, domes and God knows what else.

The astronauts also brought back some artificial products, the technologies of which have already been used by the United States, Russia, China, India and Japan. The Americans brought back to Earth a surprising secret discovered during the astronauts' stay on the Moon, and they kept this secret for many years.”

Spanish journalist Pepe Ortiz confessed that the former head of telecommunications for Apollo 11, American engineer Alan Davis, had also commented on the alleged selenite materials referred to by Hoagland.

Ortiz assured on the Mexican television program Quarto Milênio:

“NASA has remains of these ruins, which have already been analyzed.”

July 20, 1969: What has never been seen

The base coordinated by engineer Alan Davis, located on the islands of Antigua, was responsible for retransmitting the signal from Apollo 11 to the base in Houston, USA. The existence of a 10-second delay in the retransmission allowed Davis to cut the signal in case of any eventuality, before it reached the TV screens of millions of people around the world. In short, absolutely everything that NASA wanted to omit during the Apollo 11 voyage did not reach the eyes of television viewers.

The seconds of delay with Houston were effectively exploited when Davis decided to censor the signal transmission after those facilities and ruins appeared on his monitor screen. In this way, the true purpose of the Apollo 11 mission would be hidden from public view for almost four decades.

However, that valuable information ended up leaving the hands of many of the most important figures involved in the cover-up. In particular, Alan Davis himself, who after his retirement decided to spend the last days of his life in Spain, ended up becoming one of the key players in revealing the secret of space.

Davis recounted many years after July 20, 1969:

“It could have been a civilization that lived on the Moon. There were ruins that couldn’t have been just one rock on top of another; there were gaps that could have been windows or doors. There were all sorts of portals. Some starting at a meter high, which could have been windows, and others that were wider at ground level and could have been doors.”

The photos of the controversy

Ken Johnston, former director of the NASA Laboratory's Photo Conservation Section, was another person who shook the scientific community when he openly declared that many Apollo mission photos had been altered before their publication, and that many others had been destroyed.

According to Johnston, in many of them it is possible to clearly see how certain monoliths and other structures were clumsily erased from the photographs with a blade and an airbrush. Many were also subjected to a treatment that was ironically nicknamed the “Photoshop” of that time. In several other images, using graphics software, hundreds of enthusiasts believe they can visually “recover” the structures that were erased before NASA released the photos.

Richard Hoagland, a scientific advisor during the Apollo program, has made a point of examining the multiple “rainbows” that appear in lunar images. According to Hoagland, this effect is caused by crystal domes reflected on the moon, all belonging to an unknown extraterrestrial civilization.

Hoagland said:

“On the Moon there is no water, there is no atmosphere, and there are no impurities that settle on the crystal that can make structures fragile. So this makes crystal a structural material. When crystal buildings are built on the Moon, they are 20 times stronger than steel.”

Another key figure in the image controversy was US Air Force Sergeant Karl Wolfe, who was assigned to a base in Virginia to work as an archivist of photographs taken from lunar orbit.

According to Wolfe, while working at the base, he had the opportunity to appreciate many controversial images concerning the dark side of the Moon.

Wolfe said:

“[I could see] geometric figures, towers, very tall spherical constructions and structures similar to radar dishes, but of colossal proportions.”

–  Leonardo Vintiñi

These are difficult statements to prove, as no one here can go there and prove them, although the people mentioned above are only a small sample of individuals involved with NASA who have spoken out about this alleged cover-up.

Why would so many people make sensational statements and risk their professional credibility? Is it just to get a short period of fame and a little more money, or is there really something strange going on on our “ natural ” satellite?

Considering what we have seen in the mainstream media, where all news is geared towards a purpose, and also that we cannot trust everything we read, see and hear on the Internet, it seems certain that it is human nature to “shape” information so that its intended purposes are achieved. So, why wouldn’t NASA hide great secrets from us not only on the Moon, but also in other areas of science?