Quantum entanglement is the binding together of two
particles or objects, even though they may be far apart – their respective
properties are linked in a way that's not possible under the rules of classical
physics.
It's a weird phenomenon that Einstein described as
"spooky action at a distance", but its weirdness is what makes it so
fascinating to scientists. In a 2021 study, quantum entanglement was directly
observed and recorded at the macroscopic scale – a scale much bigger than the
subatomic particles normally associated with entanglement.
The dimensions involved are still very small from
our perspective – the experiments involved two tiny aluminum drums one-fifth
the width of a human hair – but in the realm of quantum physics they're
absolutely huge.
"If you analyze the position and momentum data
for the two drums independently, they each simply look hot," said
physicist John Teufel, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) in the US, last year.
"But looking at them together, we can see that
what looks like random motion of one drum is highly correlated with the other,
in a way that is only possible through quantum entanglement."
While there's nothing to say that quantum
entanglement can't happen with macroscopic objects, before this it was thought
that the effects weren't noticeable at larger scales – or perhaps that the
macroscopic scale was governed by another set of rules.
The recent research suggests that's not the case. In
fact, the same quantum rules apply here, too, and can actually be seen as well.
Researchers vibrated the tiny drum membranes using microwave photons and kept
them kept in a synchronized state in terms of their position and velocities.
To prevent outside interference, a common problem
with quantum states, the drums were cooled, entangled, and measured in separate
stages while inside a cryogenically chilled enclosure. The states of the drums
are then encoded in a reflected microwave field that works in a similar way to
radar.
Previous studies had also reported on macroscopic
quantum entanglement, but the 2021 research went further: All of the necessary
measurements were recorded rather than inferred, and the entanglement was
generated in a deterministic, non-random way.
In a related but separate series of experiments, researchers
also working with macroscopic drums (or oscillators) in a state of quantum
entanglement have shown how it's possible to measure the position and momentum
of the two drumheads at the same time.
"In our work, the drumheads exhibit a
collective quantum motion," said physicist Laure Mercier de Lepinay, from
Aalto University in Finland. "The drums vibrate in an opposite phase to
each other, such that when one of them is in an end position of the vibration
cycle, the other is in the opposite position at the same time."
"In this situation, the quantum uncertainty of
the drums' motion is canceled if the two drums are treated as one
quantum-mechanical entity."
What makes this headline news is that it gets around
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle – the idea that position and momentum can't
be perfectly measured at the same time. The principle states that recording
either measurement will interfere with the other through a process called
quantum back action.
As well as backing up the other study in
demonstrating macroscopic quantum entanglement, this particular piece of
research uses that entanglement to avoid quantum back action – essentially
investigating the line between classical physics (where the Uncertainty
Principle applies) and quantum physics (where it now doesn't appear to).
One of the potential future applications of both
sets of findings is in quantum networks – being able to manipulate and entangle
objects on a macroscopic scale so that they can power next-generation
communication networks.
"Apart from practical applications, these
experiments address how far into the macroscopic realm experiments can push the
observation of distinctly quantum phenomena," write physicists Hoi-Kwan
Lau and Aashish Clerk, who weren't involved in the studies, in a commentary on
the research published at the time.
Both the first and the second study were published
in Science.
0 Comments